The ole adage, ‘The only thing constant in life is change’, has never been more true than within the realm of health benefits. Throw in a healthy dose of health care reform and it takes it up a notch! And with that in mind, proposed changes to the regulations regarding the summary of benefits and coverage (SBC) and uniform glossary for group health plans were released December 30, 2014 by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments). Their goal is to improve consumer access to important plan information so that they can make informed choices when shopping for coverage, as well as to make it easier for health insurance issuers and group health plans to comply with providing this information. Below is information from the Proposed SBC and Uniform Glossary Rules Fact Sheet published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The proposed regulations would amend the final regulations that were published on February 14, 2012 and include revisions to the templates, instruction guides, uniform glossary, and other supporting materials for compliance with the regulations.
The proposed rules would become effective for coverage that begins on or after September 1, 2015.
Proposed rules include:
SBC Coverage Examples
The proposed regulations would retain the two current coverage examples of “having a baby (normal delivery)” and “managing diabetes type 2 (for a well-controlled condition)” and add a third example of a foot fracture with emergency room visit. Updates to the underlying pricing data are also being proposed so that the examples would more accurately reflect the allowed charges experienced by consumers in the private insurance market. The Departments also propose to permit plans and issuers to continue using the HHS-provided coverage examples calculator as an alternative means of completing the coverage examples.
Overview of SBC and Glossary Changes
The statute limits the length of the SBC to four pages. In response to feedback that the current SBC template and instructions for completing the SBC are not always conducive for certain plan designs to meet the four double-sided page limit, the Departments are proposing to revise the template to be more streamlined. In addition, the Departments are proposing to remove information that is not required by statute and has been identified through consumer testing to be less useful for consumers choosing coverage. The sample completed template for a standard group health plan has been shortened from four double sided pages to only two and a half.
The Departments are also proposing to make a number of changes to the content of the SBC and uniform glossary to reflect the private insurance market reforms under the Affordable Care Act. For example, references to annual limits for essential health benefits and preexisting condition exclusions would be removed. In addition, the disclosures relating to continuation of coverage, minimum essential coverage, and minimum value would be revised to provide more useful information to consumers, including those shopping in the individual market. Similarly, in the uniform glossary, the Departments propose to revise a few of the existing definitions and add new definitions reflecting important insurance or medical concepts (such as “claim,” “screening,” “referral,” and “specialty drug”), as well as key terms that are relevant in the context of the Affordable Care Act (such as “individual responsibility requirement,” “minimum value,” and “cost-sharing reductions”). In addition, the Departments propose to amend the 2012 final regulations to require an individual market qualified health plan issuer to disclose information related to coverage of abortion on the SBC. Note, although the 2012 final regulations did not specifically address this disclosure on the SBC, section 1303 of the Affordable Care Act and implementing regulations for that section already required issuers of individual market qualified health plans to disclose coverage of non-excepted abortion services on the SBC provided at the time of enrollment.
Consistent with prior guidance, the regulations propose that the SBC requirements do not apply to Medicare Advantage plans.
Provisions to Reduce Unnecessary Duplication
The proposed regulations would help prevent unnecessary duplication where a group health plan utilizes a binding contractual arrangement where another party assumes responsibility to provide the SBC; where a group health plan uses two or more insurance products provided by separate issuers to insure benefits with respect to a single group health plan (for example, one issuer provides medical, a different issuer provides Rx); and where the SBC for student health insurance coverage is provided by another party (such as an institution of higher education). These are consistent with prior guidance issued by the Departments.
Copies of current & proposed regulations as well as the current & proposed templates can be accessed here.